A short bit here. Donald Trump came out—finally—and said what must be in the back of the minds of most of the hard-core religious fundie contingent of the GOP, that women who get abortions ought to be punished.
It doesn’t matter that he backpedaled not four hours later and shifted it to doctors, it matters that someone at this level of politics finally said it. Out loud. For everyone to hear. If you criminalize abortion, it just naturally follows that some form of punishment should be involved. That’s logical, right?
But very quickly, two of the largest anti-abortion organizations came out in opposition to this, saying “No no no, we don’t wish to entertain any ideas about punishing women who opt for abortions.” I listened to one on NPR this morning going through ethical contortions about victimhood, which I gather means they perceive unwanted pregnancy itself as the result of women being victims and it would not be right to further victimize them for, basically, breaking the law should they, under a criminalized regime, opt to abort their pregnancies. Which in some ways is correct, but in so many other ways just misses the point. She also went on about the thousands of willing volunteers standing by to help these women once they have the baby. Which is great, I suppose, but again it misses a very large point and borders on the disingenuous. It’s like saying, “We’ll be there for you when you see your appendicitis through, don’t worry.”
Because for many women that’s roughly the equivalence. We’re talking about a condition they do not wish to be in.
Even more, the whole victim thing smells of a particular kind of slut shaming. “Oh you poor thing, you gave in and had sex, didn’t you? Well, it’s all right, you didn’t know any better, we’ll help you be a decent person now.”
But back to Trump. He said it. It’s been hovering out there all along. If it’s illegal, then what are the penalties.
A few years back some people did spot interviews with picketers at clinics, asking them the same question—what kind of penalty should there be—and the question was consistently dodged. They didn’t want to talk about that. I wrote about it. At the time I said it was quite obvious why. What they want more than anything is for abortion to simply go away. If you attach penalties, it never will. It will be in the courts then, constantly, until one day the pendulum swings the other way and suddenly abortion will not only be legal again but we’ll have laws clearly protecting the individual right to one’s own body and full say in its uses. Penalties will put it back in play in the courts.
And frankly they will lose.
They will lose because, to state it again, this issue is not about fetuses but about sex. If the concern were to reduce abortions, then the concomitant campaign against contraception and comprehensive sex education makes no sense. We know how this works, we have evidence. Abstinence only sex ed does not work. It is a dismal failure. We know this, it is not up to debate. Comprehensive sex education combined with clinics and contraceptive availability shows dramatic reductions in unwanted pregnancy and, thus, abortions. We know this, it is not rocket science.
So why won’t the so-called pro-life movement support such things?
They have excuses of course, but basically they are waging war against sex. They can’t seem to abide the idea that women have a right to their own sexuality. They can’t quite get past the conviction that sex is solely for procreation, even though obviously, possibly even for them, it is not.
But back to Trump again. He said it. Put it out there. The genie, as it were, is out of the bottle.
And it will have to be discussed. And in so discussing it, the underlying realities of the GOP platform will be laid bare. No hiding.
Trump may or may not be serious about these positions, who can say, but one thing is certain: he is a berserker. He is tearing the curtains down in the Great Hall of Oz so we can all see the man working the levers. He has said nothing which is inconsistent with any Republican position for the last umpteen years. They’re afraid of him because they all know they have to soft sell this stuff, because stated bluntly like this it sounds crazy. But they can’t just dismiss him without repudiating the very policies and beliefs he has based his own rhetoric on. In other words, now that the beast is all naked, slathering and snarling, before us, in order to get away from it they have to stop being Republicans. At least, as the party is currently formulated.
And he backpedals just like any of them have done in the past. Run on a hot-button issue and once in office try to do nothing about it, even reformulate the position in order to look reasonable.
We are right to be afraid of this man, not for what he is but for the slack-brained, adrenalized, shambling, violence-hungry bigots who follow him. He has brought them out onto the streets for all to see. They are angry and misinformed and intolerant and frightened and he has given them a stage. We have, some of us, been trying to reason with this side of our culture for a long time, convinced that surely they cannot be as bereft of the capacity to deal with reality as they seem to be. Now we know.
And the GOP knows it, too. Why do you think they don’t want open carry allowed at the national convention?