This is a very cool piece on writers’ rooms.
Author: Mark Tiedemann
De Stael
Some interesting developments recently, of an unexpected sort. I’ve finally decided to start working on volume two of my alternate history, which will be called Oculus. It didn’t occur to me for the first volume to check blogs on historical research. This time it did. Occur, that is.
So I typed in Germaine de Stael to see what popped up. I found this about an upcoming conference at, of all places, Washington University here in St. Louis, May 8 – 10, 2009.
Anyway, I promptly emailed Prof. Szmurlo, who is organizing the conference, with a query as to whether or not she would be willing to answer some questions about Madame de Stael. I honestly didn’t expect a response. I explained what I was doing, so immediately I thought I could be dropped in the Crank File (science fiction writer, oh my, one of those) and decided to keep tabs on the blog to see if the results of the conference ended up online.
(Lots of other blogs on de Stael, by the way, but mostly quotes from her writings and excessively short biographies which told me nothing I didn’t already know.)
To my surprise I received a reply that expressed interest in my project, recommended a number of newer books on the subject, and asked if I’d like to attend the conference. Well.
I finished the rough outline yesterday. Donna will go over it this weekend and, if she’s not too tired, will attack it with her usual red pen verve, and the process will commense.
I won’t be needing as much detail as I would get from this conference till the third volume, which will be largely historical, but I’d be a fool to not go.
Other minor details have fallen into place recently regarding this project, so while I am not one to subscribe to any kind of “fate” notions, it seems that the time has come to start this project. What a relief to know what I’ll be doing for the next year or so!
Thinking, Thinking…
I’m supposed to be reassessing this weekend. Instead, I’ve being reading, cleaning house, being interviewed for a YouTube video…
That was a bit surreal. I have no idea how it will come out, but it will get some exposure (pun intended), and since we live in a highly visual time that might be better promotion than anything I actually write here.
Still, it was amusing. My interlocutor asked a few questions to set the general direction of my rants and let me go. He intends to edit it down to digestible bits and put up one or two 10-minute segments on Dangerous Intersection. Mark Tiedemann on History. Mark Tiedemann on Religion. Mark Tiedemann on Sex…
I should also have been doing more writing this weekend. Donna spent the night at her sister’s house, so I had the place pretty much to myself from about five on, and here it is seven in the morning and this is the first scribbling I’ve done. I am such a lazy ass at times.
Today is the Dante Group. The penultimate canto in the Inferno. We’ve moved through this in pretty good time. Next weekend we’ll do the last canto and then wait till ’09 for Purgatory. It has been instructive and I will probably, at some point, include some of what I’ve gleaned from Dante into my fiction. I want to do another Quill story. Quill is my pilgrim in search of meaning. The only one of his pieces that has seen print is Chasing Sacrifice, published long ago in the pages of Science Fiction Age. I’ve written one more since and it’s in submission now, but…
For some reason I’ve always had trouble writing short fiction in series. A couple decades back I tried it with a character called Mix Sentenni. Street kid who manages to work his way into the space industry and pull himself up. I managed to write three stories, one of them a reworking on an earlier version. One made it into print in Space & Time, the second one got me into Clarion, and the third was an updated, completely revamped version of the first one and sold to Tales of the Unanticipated. And that was it. Never came up with another Mix story, although you’d think it would be a great vehicle for further examinations of that particular setting. Imagination failed.
Quill is my next attempt, but so far…I guess I’d be terrible writing a television show.
The notion behind Quill is to explore religious questions in a space opera setting. I decided to do them at novella length to see if that helped. And as I say, I written two. If I can do three more at that length I’d have enough for a decent fix-up novel. But…
I have a title for a third one and some ideas are churniung in my hindbrain. We’ll see. It would be nice. But in this case, it’s also a matter of not wanting to grind axes on the page. I want the stories to fall out naturally, not turn into polemic. The Dante sessions are helping.
In fact…
Accomplishments
“What you do in this world is a matter of no consequence. The question is, what can you make people believe that you have done?” Sherlock Holmes, A Study In Scarlet
Utterly cynical.
And yet….
I’ve been following the publishing industry meltdown this past couple of weeks. It was bound to come, all consumer-related industries are going to be adversely affected by this nonsensical implosion. I’ve been watchign and wondering what it might mean for… me.
At this moment I have to admit to having no career. Everything is tentative, all is on hold, I wait with baited breath (just what does that mean, I wonder?) to find out (eventually) if I’m ever going to sell anything again.
And at the moment I’m not sure I care.
Ten novels, fifty short stories. That is a career. What more can someone of modest skills and talents hope for?
Today a friend is coming over to my house to do a video interview. This will be an interesting experiment. It could open possibilities, get my face and my voice out on the web, alert people to my presence beyond those things I have already done, and hopefully give me a little better shot at continuing on in what I decided 25 years ago that I wanted to do.
I’m cleaning my office, a neverending task. I’m stumbling across the detritus of untended chores, obligations, ideas, and possibilities. Little scraps of paper with cryptic notes, phone numbers, email addresses, various numbers, single words, dates…
Last night I watched George Carlin’s last HBO Special. I’ll miss him. I’m not quite as cynical or curmudgeonly as George was, certainly not as gifted in the ability to talk about certain things in such a humorous way. I’ll miss him, his presence in the world. I never knew him, but always with celebrity like that you have the feeling that you did know him.
Afterward, a long talk with two friends, one who pointed out that I sounded depressed. Not sad, not forelorn, not pessimistic—Depressed. Maybe. It’s hard to tell. I bounce back, get excited, work on something. I am working on something lately, as I’ve mentioned. As long as the words keep coming out, some of them anyway, I don’t think I need to go to the doctor. But I passed up going to the gym again this morning. Too cold, too tired, too—
Maybe 2009 will be better. (I keep telling myself that, anyway.) Anyway, I still have more cleaning to do. I found the opening quote on an index card that it browned with age. It meant something to me at one time and I think it still does.
What does it mean to you?
Sibelius
I love Sibelius. I find his themes, motifs, melodies absolutely immersing. He was touted once as the heir to Beethoven and while I think Dvorak rightly deserves that title, in the 20th Century it’s hard to beat Sibelius.
I’m reading Alex Ross’s history of music in the 20th Century, The Rest Is Noise. It’s a fine book. Ross has a gift. Every once in a while I run across a piece of writing that is just begging to be shared. Today I read this, about the place where Sibelius lived.
Ainola stands much as Sibelius left it. The atmosphere of the house is heavy and musty, as if the composer’s spirit were still pent up inside. But you get a different feeling when you walk into the forest that stretches out on one side of the house. The treetops meet in an endless curving canopy, tendrils of sunlight dangling down. The ground is uncluttered: many paths fork among the trunks. Venturing a little farther into the wood, you lose sight of all human habitation. A profound stillness descends. The light begins to fail, the mists roll in. After a while, you may begin to wonder if you will ever find your way back. Many times in Sibelius’s music the exaltation of natural sublimity gives way to inchoate fear, which has less to do with the outer landscape than with the inner one, the forest of the mind.
Mm!
And yes, you can certainly get that from the music. Especially the later symphonies. But I can talk about that another time. For now, I just wanted to share this piece of exceptional writing.
Curiousness
I have a spam filter on this blog which blocks robo-posts. These things come from who knows where, really, and I’ve had them so bad before that they filled my server and prevented all manner of useful function. I do check from time to time to make sure nothing legitimate has been dumped into the spam file, just on the off-chance that someone actually wanted to make a comment on one of these posts. Usually the address is a domain number, the tagline something innocuous, but the body of the post is often economical and surreal. Generally I get a lot of ads from drug suppliers, for pain killers, blood pressure medicine, Viagra knock-offs, etc.
Then there are the sex ads, which go from fairly mundane (naked girls, etc) to the truly weird (zoo sex). One the other day cracked me up.
Oral Roberts. Oral sex. Oral sex technique.
I’m trying to imagine receiving instruction or advice on the second two from the first and it just won’t scan…
New Project
This past weekend was productive. I began work on the outline to my next novel. I’ve been fiddling around with something since May, when I finished The Spanish Bride. I was exhausted, burned out, just plain not interested. I still seem to be caught in some kind of writer’s block about short stories, but I spun out nearly ten pages of single-spaced outline for the sequel to Orleans. There is the slightly-better-than-remote possibility that Orleans could get picked up, and if so then I will nned to write the rest of the trilogy.
Oculus will pick up pretty much where Orleans left off. (Yes, the titles are all “O” titles, including the overall title of the trilogy, which is the Oxun Trilogy. Oxun is the South American river goddess, the only female of the bunch that outwitted the boys and became just as if not more powerful than the others. I’m using it as a metaphor rather than a plot device, but she just might turn up somewhere along the line anyway.)
It feels good to be writing something again. Other than grant proposals, blog posts, and assorted newsletter stuff.
Couple of things I need that will be difficult to find.
A substantial part of the background of these novels (alternate history) deals with Germaine de Stael. Google her, quite a woman. The only woman who ever frightened Napoleon. But he wouldn’t have her just killed. He exiled her, banished her, had his secret police at one point chase her all over Europe and into Russia…anyway, I became fascinated with her. I’ve got her memoir about her exile, a book of her philosophical and political writings, a solid biography, etc. As with most such projects, it is the most unlikely little details that can hang you up.
Her father, Jacques Necker (google him, too—this family was important) at one point bought 38,000 acres in New York. Germaine herself added to it and, according to the biography I have, “came to own a substantial part of upstate New York. But of course I haven’t been able to pin her holdings down. I probably could if I went to Albany and septn a weekend or more in their public records archive, etc. I probably won’t do that. I’ve looked at a map, I’ve seen what upstate New York contains, and just decided where her holdings would have been. Part of the action of the novel takes place in Saranac Lake and vicinity. Lot of French town names around there. Seems a safe bet.
Anyway, it would be nice to know specifically where her holdings were. If anyone reads this and has a way of finding this out, please email me at info@marktiedemann.com
A minor side issue to this. There is a largish island in Upper Lake Saranac. It’d be nice to know a little about it. I’ll track some of this down eventually myself, but I thought I’d ask.
I’ve been stewing in my own juices most of this year. Time to get off my butt and write something new. Stay tuned.
Why I Write
From time to time someone asks me (as, no doubt, they ask other writers) why I do it. Why, specifically, I write fiction as opposed to nonfiction. It really is hard to explain to those who seem tone-deaf to what we call Art. Sometimes it’s hard to explain to yourself. The short answer for me is that I love it. I love creating stories and weird stuff and making up plots, because I always loved stories. (When I was a kid, I’d watch movies in which a group of people are thrust into a really cool adventure and at some point one of them would talk about wanting to just go home and having everything return to normal. And, as a kid, I’d think why would you want to do that? Can’t you see that what you’re doing now is so much cooler than going back to a dull life? That was a kid talking, of course, because the stories were in fact so much cooler than what passed for my “real life.” It’s only later that you realize that part of your “real” life was the freedom to indulge stories, pretend, and thrust yourself—quite safely—into adventures.) Telling stories just felt like the coolest thing to do.
But then you grow up and actually try to do it and if you stick with it long enough to discover all sorts of other aspects to it that you couldn’t imagine as a kid just looking for a neat ride. And that’s the art. And that is hard to describe to people who don’t read fiction, who don’t Get It.
Dan Simmons wrote a novel called The Crook Factory about Ernest Hemingway in WWII. He lived in Cuba then and he ran an amateur spy ring, hunting submarines, for a time. This much is true. Simmons built a very intricate and thrilling novel around it. His viewpoint character, though, is a FBI agent who is one of those with the tin ear, who doesn’t Get It, why someone would write fiction.
Late in the novel they have a conversation about it. Here is part of it.
“Why do you do it?”
“Do what?
“Write fiction rather than write about true things.”
Hemingway shook his head. “It’s hard to be a great writer, Lucas, if you love the world and living in it and you love special people. It’s even harder when you love so many places. You can’t just transcribe things from the outside in, that’s photography. You have to do it the way Cezanne did, from inside yourself. That’s art. You have to do it from inside yourself. Do you understand?”
“No.”
Hemingway sighed softly and nodded. “It’s like listening to people, LUcas. If their experiences are vivid, they become a part of you, whether or not their stories are bullshit or not. It doesn’t matter. After a while, their experiences get to be more vivid than your own. Then you mix it all together. You invent from your own life stories and from all of theirs, and after a while it doesn’t matter which is which…what’s yours and what’s theirs, what was true and what was bullshit. It’s all true then. It’s the country you know, and the weather. Everyone you know…the trick in fiction is like the trick in packing a boat just so without losing trim. There are a thousand intangibles that have to be crammed into every sentence. Most of it should not visible, just suggested…
“Anyway, the…trick is to write truer than true. And that’s why I write fiction rather than fact.”
That’s one way to describe it. I didn’t realize truth had anything to do with it until I read an Algis Budrys review of a Gene Wolfe novel. He said of Wolfe that he told the truth well. I puzzled over that for a time before it clicked. I’d been saying something of the sort for a long time concerning philosophy—that there’s truth and then there’s fact. Occasionally the two meet and become tangled up and are in many respects the same thing, but mostly there are facts, which have no meaning. Truth is the meaning, which must be derived or extrapolated from fact. Which led me to the conclusion that Truth is a process, an ongoing experience of recognition. One of the places I’ve found it has been in good fiction.
I don’t know if Hemingway ever actually said the above—it sounds like something he would have said, though, which makes it true, whether there is the fact of it or not. And that is what fiction does.
The Curmudgeon Speaks
The curmudgeon in repose observes the feckless maunderings of the primates in their dispeptic self-justifications. Christmas is coming. You can see it, feel it, sense it. Not only in the more pleasant garnishments appearing too early (and hopefully) in stores and streets, but in the renewed efforts of those who can’t get past their own distorted misapprehensions and so fling the feces of their discontent at the crowds.
A couple years ago I received one these from an anonymous source. It purports to be a letter from Ben Stein, based on a broadcast he did one Sunday on CBS. From the page you’ll see that it was added to, taken out of context, and corrupted. The source from whom I received it this year surprised me, so I shot back the link to this site. Naturally, the person in question was miffed. No one likes to be told they’ve been a patsy.
There’s an ugliness to this kind of thing that upsets me a lot. Basically, it is the linkage of No Prayer to Ruin and Death. All those people in New Orleans, in this formulation, lost their homes and lives because people elsewhere had stopped praying. So god let the waves in to punish us—and then didn’t bother to tell us that’s what he’d done.
Never mind the whole dubious connection between prayer and anything remotely like the salvation of a whole city from a hurricane. I recall once seeing a news broadcast from Italy of a priest standing adamnantly flinging holy water at approaching lava from a volcano, as if it would do anything to dissuade the destruction to avert. Coincidence and serendipity account for enough weird conjugations in this world so anyone with a mind toward conflating unrelated events can point and say “See! It Works!â€Â But really, all this attests is the cloying desire to feel that something in the universe actually cares other than your next door neighbor or the dog.
Basically the notion here is what? We have barred public prayer from public school classrooms and tossed a couple of creches off public property and the result is that god, irked, inundates a city? Or just allows it to happen? And why would that be when the overwhelming majority of citizens in this country profess to believe in god and pray a good deal? Once again we are told god is some kind of emotionally-stunted adolescent who needs our total attention, lest he throw a tantrum and kill a few hundred thousand people every now and then. And then we go to church and are exhorted to give thanks to a god who “loves us†so much that…
I don’t need to address in detail, you all know what I mean.
Come on. Do people really buy that? I mean, the whole Christmas decoration thing is irritating and I can understand people not wanting their holiday messed up with politics, but to make the extra leap and suggest that we’re being punished over some superstitious equivalent of not throwing salt over our left shoulder when we spill it is a bit much.
Yeah, I know, some people really do think that way, but a lot of other people just tacitly let it go by as challenging it might make them look like Scrooge or something. It’s such nonsense. Why shouldn’t we be able to call something like this garbage without looking like curmudgeons? It’s ugly. It’s false. It’s a lie on its face. But some people just have to let the rest of us know how much we’re Not Getting It. Some people have to send these lovely missives out just so we don’t get the feeling that Christmas is a time of love and good cheer and giving and that we should feel better about the world. Some people just have to act like the midges they are and try to make us the same way.
Sigh…. and just when I was starting to feel festive.
So the holiday season begins.
Bah Humbug.
Rio Bravo
I had to go to Wal-Mart this past weekend. I know, I know, big box store, destructive of small town America, yadda-yadda. I hate them, but once a year we do a Wal-Mart run for all kinds of stuff that, frankly, just ain’t as cheap anywhere else—toilet paper, vitamins, tissue paper, day-to-day Stuff.
Usually I go with Donna. This time she was in Iowa and I did it solo.
Since I was there anyway, I browsed the big stack of remainder DVDs they always have and I went a little bonkers. I bought the first season of the original Robin Hood with Richard Greene. I remember the show as a kid and loved it, so for $5.00, why not? (A real stitch, too, to see all these young actors who later did so much better—a skinny Leo McKern was a real hoot!)
Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, Shane, The Mask of Zorro… I’m filling gaps sort of. But I came home and immediately watched Rio Bravo. You know, the movie got made over at least twice, maybe three times. The best remake was El Dorado, but the original has something about it that the rest lack. I loved the soundtrack, the overamplified gunshots, the seriously deficient acting of Rickie Nelson. It’s a real jumbled mess, you know. Dean Martin’s performance was the best thing in the film and it’s actually really damn good. Wayne was, well, John Wayne.
There are two John Wayne movies from back then that I think showcased what the man could actually do. I think he was such an icon that he really couldn’t be seen as anything else, so some of his performances were seriously underappreciated. Anyone who thinks the man couldn’t act hasn’t seen The Searchers, which is a very disturbing movie and Wayne played a very disturbed character. The other one was The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance. Wayne isn’t the main character. Not quite a supporting role, but definitely part of an ensemble, and it really is a rather convincing, sometimes moving performance. It’s very much about the waining (pardon the pun) of the macho guy of the West. His character is tough, independent, building his life competently, laying plans, and being, in the larger scheme of things, a Good Man. But he loses it all to the educated Easterner who shows up in the guise of Jimmy Stewart carrying a stack of law books. Both men get a lesson in realities, but where the lesson destroys one, it makes the other, and it is anything but a simple formula western.
(I suppose you could throw Red River in there as well, but then we could go down the list of great Wayne westerns that were just…well, pretty fine, actually.)
Rio Bravo, though, is the pure stuff of early western myth. It’s formula to the core, but Howard Hawks made it work like a well-tuned V-8. The photography was terrific and this DVD had restored Technicolor print. When Technicolor was good it was the best. There were times, though, when it didn’t work very well, but that was the cinematographers’ fault. Here it works.
One thing, though—Angie Dickinson. She got better, but she really wasn’t a very good actress. Nice to look at though, and she actually held her own against Wayne, but…well, she got better.
Wayne became a target in the Sixties and Seventies for people who were intolerant of any kind of unapologetic patriotism, and he did overdo the flagwaving. It’s a shame, but it was a war of symbols. When you talk to people who knew him, the public image was somewhat at odds with the man himself. I spoke once with George Takei about him. Takei was in The Green Berets with Wayne and, despite their differences politically, he had nothing but nice things to say about Wayne, who labeled him Captain Sulu from day one. Takei said the rule on the set was No Politics. It was a smooth, cordial set, and Wayne was responsible for keeping the latent heat at a manageable level, an impressive feat given the subject of the film and time it was being made.
Wayne avoided military service in WWII because he had a family. I don’t know exactly how that worked—lots of men with families went—but he somehow made the argument that his presence in films would be more beneficial than his presence on a battlefield. Depending on how you look at it, he was right. It raises the question of how authentic one needs to be to espouse patriotic feeling. Did Waynes later flagwaving require that he make the ultimate sacrifice, or could he be a patriot without needing to wear a uniform? He put on a television special in the late Sixties about America. It was a bombastic jeremiad about how wonderful the country is. He did, however, get a lot of interesting people on it, like Robert Culp, who was very much an anti-war protestor at the time. Thinking back on it now, I realize that at no point in it did he advocate going to Vietnam. He never said that to be a Good American one had to put on a uniform and pick up a gun. He just pushed the idea that the country was worth loving.
His last film, The Shootist, was a sad one. He went out in a blaze of gunfire, taking out a number of old enemies in one last shoot-out. It can be read as an unapologetic, last hurrah for the way of the gun. But it was also an admission that times had changed and he was dying, and the fitting end to his life would be to die as he lived. A little over the top, that, but in its way bravely tragic. After seeing it, one could go back over a long body of work to see elements of that tragic admission that this was all over. And probably just as well. Nathan rescued Lucy from the Indians, brought her home, and then had to leave. He didn’t belong anymore.
Wayne was one of the first and for a long time the only Big Name Star who allowed himself to be killed on screen. I don’t know if that was his idea or if he just accepted it as a necessary part of good storytelling. But there are many Wayne movies wherein the “hero” must leave, because the violence necessary to resolve the conflict makes him unsuitable for the world he has just made safe. I think that gets overlooked a lot. Too much.