Fidelity To The Future: William Gibson’s Neuromancer
Of all genres, science fiction seems the most susceptible to anachronism. To “dating.” Stories written a decade or more ago can betray oddities to the contemporary reader that must, to greater of lesser degree, be compenstated for. Technology does not go whefe we think it will, even when we might get the broad outlines right. Details will trip us up. The most succesful authors avoided this by not being too specific, by suggesting things can be done and then leaving the methods and means up to the reader. FTL is a case in point, though that one seems to have been a difficult-to-ignore challenge for many writers. How that might work becomes a necessary element differentiating hard from soft SF. There’s perhaps a bit of showing off going on, but usually it’s an attempt to add verisimilitude to the story. But it’s chancy. For instance, payphones. It’s likely a certain audience will react with “What?” And either draw a blank